Home

Advertisement

all dressed up for school [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
pet_studies

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Things That I Love #1 [May. 13th, 2009|01:39 pm]
[Tags|, ]
[Current Music |"I Live for the Sun" by the Sunrays]



How freaking hip did Brian look during this period? Sweet fringe and big glasses hanging out by the tape machine. I know this has nothing to do with my studies, but sometimes it's nice to remember the little things that I really love about the Beach Boys. Maybe I can make this a series... the little things I still love about the Beach Boys that haven't been destroyed by picking their music apart. Oh I'm being dramatic, nothing has really been destroyed.

Okay:
Little Things I Love About the Beach Boys #1
How freaking hip Brian looked during the 1965-early 1967 period. Nerd glasses and fringe aside (always a sucker for those things!), he always looks so inspired, determined and focused. In the studio snaps of him around this time, you can just see all the creative stuff ticking over in his brain. When I lived at home and had my piano, I had a shot of Brian during this period in a frame on top of the lid and it really did inspire me every day.

Link2 comments|Leave a comment

Some junk about rhythmic feels....bup did-it. [Mar. 16th, 2009|12:56 pm]
[Tags|, , , ]
[Current Mood | distracted]

Hello Pet Studies,

I know it's been a long time between posts, but I think the main reason that has prevented me from updating more regularly is my reluctance to want to fill this thing with negativity. If I'm honest, the last few months (maybe more) have been very difficult for me in relation to my work. I have lost motivation, forgotten why I started, wondered if I had made the right decision in attempting this in the first place, trying to figure out if I am really "smart enough" to pull this off, battling with a lot of distractions (like having a lot of fun playing pop music with my friends)... I suspect this isn't any different to any other PhD experience, but it has been tough going and I've cried a lot of tears over it. I'm still not entirely sure of what I'm doing, whether this is the right thing to be doing right now, but I have to try and press on anyway...

At the moment, I'm trying to get through an analysis of the Beach Boys rhythmic feels. This has been quite a difficult task for me because rhythm has never been my strong point. My ace friend Shanon has been helping me go through a few things I've needed to transcribe and I'll try to include some of stuff we've talked through and he has charted. The following is just a little rant about rhythm... a quick little overview, a few songs I've been looking at, why rhythms are important to the Beach Boys, and so forth. Certainly not written out properly, this is just to get a few ideas out there. I have a lot to rant about so this is just the first in a few parts - Lj will only let me post so much at a time. Alrighty, part one.

A consideration of the rhythmic feels used in the Beach Boys’ music (a brief rant).

An introduction to the Beach Boys line-up during the early-to-mid 1960s.
It is important to note the changes in the Beach Boys’ line-up during 1962 and 1966 to better understand the development of their rhythmic practices. In 1962, the band consisted of brothers Brian (bass/piano), Carl (lead guitar) and Dennis Wilson (drums), Mike Love (vocals/saxophone) and Al Jardine (guitar). From late 1962 to early 1964, Jardine was replaced by David Marks, who was replaced again by Jardine in mid 1964.

For the first two Beach Boys releases (Surfin’ Safari and Sufin’ USA), the Beach Boys band played in the studio on the recordings. From 1963 onwards, the Beach Boys broke into two groups – the touring band which played live and promoted the music, and the studio group made up of Los Angeles session musicians affectionately referred to as the “Wrecking Crew”. Brian Wilson chose these musicians in particular as he had heard and seen them play on the productions of Phil Spector during the early 1960’s and was enamoured by the huge, layered sound he achieved. The influence of Phil Spector on Brian Wilson’s production style culminated with the instrumental timbre experiments on the 1965 Today! album, though a detailed exploration of the extent of Spector’s influence may be too large and tangential for a discussion of rhythmic feels.

After the touring band returned home from their commitments, they then sang over the backing track made by the Wrecking Crew (sometimes with the addition of Carl Wilson’s guitar) to complete the recording. From 1964 onwards, Brian Wilson stayed at home in Los Angeles to focus on writing and producing the Beach Boys albums and was replaced on the road by Glen Campbell and finally Bruce Johnston.

A brief overview of the role of the drums:
In the Beach Boys’ music, the drums are often not the most interesting rhythmic aspect of a song. In their early music (1962-63), drums consisted of a simple backbeat on kick, snare and high-hat (“Surfin’ USA”, “Little Deuce Coupe”). This was due to two reasons. Firstly, the limitations of Dennis Wilson’s technical ability on the drums and secondly, the style of the Beach Boys music during this period which mainly consisted of covers and songs in a surf-rock style. In a curious paradox, the role of the drums became less complex and less important over time, though the role of rhythm became more important.

From late 1963 to early 1965, the drums became even more simplistic; a simple back beat on kick and snare was used for both upbeat numbers (“Fun Fun Fun”, “Little Honda”) and ballads (“Don’t Worry Baby”, “Keep an Eye on Summer”). In most cases, the high hats were often replaced by a piano comping 8th note chords. Some unique cases may substitute jingle bells for high hats (“Drive-In”) or use high-hats to denote a particular section (the bridge section of “Warmth of the Sun”, for example). In 1965-1966 recordings, the comping 8th note piano figure was often doubled by organs or other keyboard sounds to add instrumental texture. Other elements, such as percussion, began to be more regularly included to replace parts usually played by the high hats and snare. For example, the use of woodblock in place of a snare during the verses of “Kiss Me Baby”; tambourines and woodblocks during the verses of “Let Him Run Wild”.

During the mid-1960s period, drums could often play no role in grounding the rhythmic feel of a song, instead playing small fills (often on snare or toms) between lyric lines or to denote a change in structural sections. This is most predominant on the Pet Sounds album, with many songs favouring the use of melodic and percussive instruments over a standard rock drum kit, for example, the use of tambourine, harpsichord and timpani in “You Still Believe in Me”; the use of syncopated tambourine and tom parts in “That’s Not Me”; the use of high hats only throughout “Don’t Talk (Put Your Head on My Shoulder)”; tambourine, timpani and bass harmonica during “I Know There’s an Answer”; muted bells and the sound of an empty water container struck through the verses of “Caroline, No”. It could be suggested that this point in time emphasised a change from more standard rock rhythmic practices (ie: the backbeat) to a focus more on musical form, structure and instrumental timbre.

It is sometimes useful to consider the Beach Boys’ rhythmic structure in (instrumental) layers:

5) Harmony parts (blow harmonies provide long sustained notes while rhythmically punctuated nonsense syllables* (bah-bah, doo-doo, dit-dit, etc) provide an additional rhythmic layer)
4) Incidental instruments (these include horns, flute, strings, other keyboard instruments, etc) which play typically melodic parts above these 3 layers.
3) Instrumental rhythm - Block 8th note chords by guitars and piano.
2) Bass (usually playing a walking or arpeggiated part)
1) Drums (usually cementing a basic backbeat)

Here is an expanded version of these instrumental layers )

It must be noted that this rough outline is only applicable to Beach Boys records made before 1966. With the release of Pet Sounds, the intertwining of rhythmic layers is such that even standard melodic instruments such as guitars, pianos and bass, form part of a vague “rhythm section”. As such, each song requires individual consideration as no such framework can cover the broad range of rhythmic practices employed on Pet Sounds.

*I must admit my favourite rhythmic harmonies are "aum-dot-did-it" from "This Whole World" (which I unfortunately am not looking at in this study, but is a little GEM of a tune), "run run weeooo" from "Wouldn't it Be Nice" and "rah rah rah rah sis boom bah" from "Be True to Your School" - purely for its ridiculousness.

Oh gee, isn't this exciting? Hang on to your seats for part two!
Link1 comment|Leave a comment

(no subject) [Nov. 24th, 2008|09:57 am]
[Tags|, ]
[Current Mood | pshh]

An email about the conference I applied to next year in Liverpool:

Dear JADEY O'REGAN

We are writing to inform you that your paper, Endless Harmony; an interdisciplinary approach to defining the Beach Boys' sound, has been placed on a waitlist for the International Association for the Study of Popular Music's biennial conference, Popular Music Worlds, Popular Music Histories. We had an overwhelming response to our call for papers this year and had to make some very difficult decisions.

In the event that spaces become available following the withdrawal of accepted delegates, we may write to you again to see if you are still interested in presenting at the conference. Otherwise, we hope you will find another forum in which to present your material.

Freya Jarman
On behalf of Geoff Stahl
Chair, IASPM-International


I have been feeling particularly lost, unmotivated and uninspired about my research for weeks now, so despire the fact that my brain can see this for what it is (oh well, better luck next time), my heart has taken it completely the wrong way. With its stupid logic, I can warp this around as proof that my research is stupid and uninteresting. I think a bit of positivity would have gone a long way at the moment.
Link8 comments|Leave a comment

(no subject) [Aug. 15th, 2008|05:46 pm]
[Current Mood | stressed]

i just received this email regarding one of the abstracts i submitted a couple of months ago:

Dear presenter,

Thank you for submitting your abstract for the IASPM-ANZ conference "Stuck in the Middle: The Mainstream and its Discontents."

The organising committee is pleased to advise that your abstract has been accepted. Please note that, except for panels, all paper presentations should be of 30mins duration (20mins presentation and 10mins question time).

Please respond to this letter with an email indicating your intention to participate in the conference (email: g.carfoot@griffith.edu.au). You will be sent a further email when registration details are available very shortly.

Please also ensure that your IASPM-ANZ membership is up to date (for further details on membership, see the following link: http://iaspm.org.au/).  Proof of membership may be required at the beginning of the conference.

Note that information on the conference, including updated accommodation options, is available at the following website: http://iaspm.org.au/2008/conf/

If you have any other questions, concerns or requests, feel free to contact us at any time by email. Thank you and we look forward to seeing you in Brisbane in November.


Yours sincerely
Andy Bennett, Sarah Baker and Gavin Carfoot



dear PRESENTER. that's me! that is kind of neat...it will be my first conference presentation and i suspect i need all the practice i can get. it also reminds me that i really need to sign up for membership of the IASPM. i wasn't quite as worried about this particular presentation, the one i am really worried about (and hoping will come through okay) is the conference in Liverpool next year. i probably still have somewhere between now and november to wait until i know but i mostly try to put it out of my mind.

in fact i have to put all of this out of my mind because i need 4500 words written by this time next week. fuck fuck fuck.
Link1 comment|Leave a comment

a leaf on a windy day [Jul. 29th, 2008|02:35 pm]
[Current Mood | tired]

i am sure feeling overwhelmed with my work at the moment.

on friday i "finished up" the first part of my musical analysis. this included charting the structure of each song from 8 albums (these are all colour-coded to find patterns), instrumentation (a big chart that lists every instrument playing and what it is doing), tempo, time signature and track times for each song, chord charts for each song, a chart listing the types of harmony parts used in each song and the beginnings of a lyrical analysis, dividing all songs into 'most common" themes. i have decided to not include 'pet sounds' in this, purely because it is so much more complicated than the other records and sometimes doesn't even fit the charts i've worked out so far. 'pet sounds' will have to be a work in progress, i think. it's taken a bit of the pressure off too, because i've been putting that album off for months due to just being too scared to work on it. i'm not sure if that's because it's just REALLY HARD, or because i'm torn about tearing apart my favourite record. i can't really tell, but if it's the latter, i better get over that pretty soon.

i printed all of my charts out this morning and filed them all away so i can use them properly when it comes time to make sense of all this data. i thought i would be more impressed but all i could think was 'is this it?' - this has been 8 months (+) work and it only really amounts to a couple of ring binders of charts and letters and numbers. i know that i HAVE done work, just when it's all put together, it doesn't really seem like it. i'd paste some of it in here but the tables are so large, lj can't handle the code.

i am really struggling through things lately...struggling for motivation, mostly. i really, really need a PROPER break, but i can't take one until early september, after my confirmation at the end of august. until then, i have so much work to do that i often feel i don't know where to start. well, i suppose i do what needs to be done, but trying to organise it in my head is really confusing at the moment. i think in my head i thought by my second year i'd be feeling more comfortable with being a phd student, i'd feel more at ease with what i can do, what i have to do, and i'd feel more together with it. shouldn't second year be easier than the first? the more time goes on, i realise that moment probably isn't going to come. i understand this is my own fault, but damn, i really wanted to be over the random bouts of "maybe this was a stupid idea afterall, what am i doing! why am i doing this at 24 when i should be blowing all my savings on roadtripping around the US like i want to? why is everyone i know getting married or engaged or buying houses and having babies and i am still a student living below the poverty line?" - i have really hit a weird slump. argh, i really need some perspective.

i don't mean to sound ungrateful, i am lucky to do what i am doing, i'm lucky to have the opportunity so young, but oh hell, it's just so hard sometimes.

now that i've finished that data collecting, i have to start trying to find patterns, traits or other weird/interesting things in the numbers and charts. i am thinking of taking donna's advice and taking tomorrow off and come back to the charts on thursday... maybe i just need some space from them to be able to see what's actually in front of me, instead of all of the data blurring into one big puddle.
Link13 comments|Leave a comment

your summer dream [Jul. 2nd, 2008|03:47 pm]
[Current Mood | anxious]

----- Original Message -----
From: "IASPM 2009 Conference" <iaspm2009@iaspm.net>
To: That girl who has been way too stressed out this week.
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 6:40 PM
Subject: IASPM Conference Abstract Receipt


Thank you for sending us your abstract for the IASPM conference conference in Liverpool, to be held from July 13-17, 2009. Please note that we will notify you no later than November 1, 2008 as to your acceptance.



Please do not hesitate to contact the convenor of your stream if you have any questions.



Best regards,

The IASPM Executive.

...........................................................

thank gawd IT'S OVER.
for now.
Link3 comments|Leave a comment

comic. [Jun. 18th, 2008|08:48 am]

i could pretty much post every phdcomic on my blog, but this one pretty much sums up my week already.
Link3 comments|Leave a comment

ninety! [Jun. 16th, 2008|05:45 pm]
here is an updated list of how many songs i have worked out charts for so far:

so this is what i've been doing all year? )

when i look at it like that, it almost seems like i've done some WORK!
Link5 comments|Leave a comment

won't last forever, it's kind of sad. [Jun. 16th, 2008|04:08 pm]
[Current Mood | anxious]

well, here i am at the end of my first week back to work. i took last week off entirely and did my best to have a guilt free break. as is usual with these things, it wasn't much of a "holiday" - it was mostly filled with catching up on odd jobs and practicing for gigs/rehearsals....but i did buy an excellent polka dot dress on a shopping afternoon and i did spent a couple of days up in the blue mountains. unfortunately it rained the whole time and everywhere was mostly covered with fog, and if not fog, then very icy winds, but tim and i made the most of it. we had big b+b breakfasts and ate some lovely dinners and did some wandering around second hand bookstores and record stores in the mountains for a whole day and had hot chocolates, watched music documentaries by our tiny fireplace...it was nice. i also managed to find a couple of gems (a copy of 'on record' for $15 and 'understanding popular music' by roy shuker for cheaps).

to start this week back at work, i even bought a sweet new office chair... a proper one, so i don't keep ruining my shoulders all the time. surely all of that should make me a lot more productive....right?

well, i guess it has. i have had an okay week work wise, i have made a lot of lists and tried to organise my time. sometimes "organising" can just be an excuse for procrastination but i think i have been doing useful organising, working out what needs to be done by what times. in fact, i'm trying to embrace google calendar and this week have tried to plan out almost every part of the day by forcing myself to switch to different tasks. this seems totally pedantic but lately i've been having a lot of trouble concentrating and if i don't write myself one of these things, my tendency is to get distracted, read books, listen to unrelated music, play the piano, see what's on oprah(!), anything but actually do my work.



this looks like all kinds of lame, but it's actually quite refreshing to have a little box pop up every couple of hours that says "change to something else now!" - i've actually been working for entire days without getting too sidetracked, which is a pretty big improvement for me.

at the moment, i am working on 3 different things:

1) instrumentation.
now that i have collected a number of sea of tunes bootlegs, i am going back through my tables on instrumentation (these first ones are very simple and have missed SO MANY INSTRUMENTS) and redoing things in excel. this process is proving to be the most interesting so far as i've finding all sorts of ideas, tricks, patterns and questions coming out of this process. i tried to include one of my big tables but it is too large for one pet studies post (no, really, it won't let me post it). basically in one column i have the track name, the next is the list of instruments, and the third is a description of what that instrument is doing (when it enters, what it sounds like, what part it plays, etc). this is a HUGE job.

this week i have been working on the Today! record. unlike most of the bootlegs which have 1-4 discs, the Today! sessions have 8 discs for me to trawl though. two of these discs are devoted entirely to one song each - "please let me wonder" and "when i grow up (to be a man)", which is bittersweet for me as they happened to be my favourite two tracks from Today! - it's good because i get to listen and learn about them in an in depth way, but also quite emotionally draining because they're songs that really get to me on a bunch of different levels, the latter one especially. it's probably in my TOP 5 (TOP 6 maybe...?) beach boys songs and for some reason makes me want to cry every time i hear it. something about brian's falsetto singing "will i love my wife for the rest of my life, when i grow up to be a man? it won't last forever, it's kind of sad"... it just rips me apart. after listening to 40 takes of this song, i was absolutely sobbing and walked into the living room and said to tim 'i can't take this anymore!'... he just kind of laughed and said that it was just proof that i'm doing what i'm meant to be doing.

i just felt like a bit embarrassed.
heaven help me when i get to "god only knows".

i digress... in any case, some of these songs have up to 15 instruments in them (and that's counting saxes, trumpets and trombones as "horns" and violins, cellos, etc as "strings") so it's pretty much been doing my head in.

2) writing up notes from my musical studies
then next step after this (which i have already started) is to write up a list of organised notes and questions about what has come up in my musical analysis. after that, i have to turn those notes into the basis of my confirmation presentation at the end of august. yikes.

3) abstract for IASPM 2009
i am still trying to get my head together to write a 250 word (yes, ONLY 250 and i'm struggling, hell!) abstract to submit to the IASPM conference by july 1st. the 2009 conference is in LIVERPOOL (yes, UK liverpool, the sydney people i know ask me "liverpool? why would they have it all the way out there?") so i'm totally desperate to go. can you imagine all the sweet beatles junk i could take in? also, being able to listen to so many papers on pop music in one place and meeting lots of people i read about! i have to actually SUBMIT something first so i'm getting ahead of myself. my problem is that i'm writing an abstract for a paper than doesn't actually exist. it has to exist in a year's time... so, uhm, thinking of exactly what i will be able to say in a year's time is a good exercise, i guess, but also kind of difficult.

to help this a bit, last week tim and i recorded a chat on my ipod where he asked me a few questions about things and got me ranting. i thought most of what i would say would be pointless and tangential but playing it back i had a lot of neat ideas i didn't even realise i had. transcribing an hour's worth of chatting is tough work though! phew! he is a pretty excellent helper though.

.........
since this post has taken days to get around to finishing, on the weekend tim and i drove past an old building that said BOOK SALE! on the front of it. we decided to stop and check it out, and it turned out to be an academic remainders book sale and i picked up david brackett's "interpreting popular music" for $13! no freaking way! i've had a lot of luck with books lately, it was worth the stop for that alone, i dig brackett a lot.

in other great news, i've had more good chats with probyn over emails, they make me HAPPY every time they come into my inbox. i also sent nelson an email the other day too, just keeping in touch and asking if he wouldn't mind helping out with some percussion questions, to which he wrote:

"Hey Jadey!!,

I'd love to help any way I can. In fact, I'll ask a few of the others any questions you have if you'd like. Just make a complete and very detailed list and I'll see what I can do. Hell, I'll even ask Brian stuff...though I'm not sure how he'll react. Most likely very positively I think.. I can try. It won't hurt. Many in the band know so very much more than I so please... feel free to ask anything and I'll reach the proper party..... who knows best yea??? Be free and comfortable with any questions.


Stay In Touch, Nelson"


pretty freaking cool for a fangirl like me. ("oh, i'll just ask brian if you like" - OH OKAY!) when i left from work at jb hifi (bundall) that rainy wednesday night in 2002 and drove up to the entertainment centre to see brian wilson + band play "pet sounds" all the way through for the first time, i certainly didn't imagine that 6 years later i would be emailing back and forth with them every couple of days chatting about the beach boys and my PHD. you really can't ever tell how things will work out. thinking about that night now seems like a whole lifetime ago.

okay, enough nostalgia!
Link5 comments|Leave a comment

a rock in a landslide. [May. 19th, 2008|11:00 am]
[Tags|, , , ]
[Current Mood | stressed]
[Current Music |"tiger on a treadmill" by josh fix]

HELLO NEGATIVITY!
i feel like i am having a rotten start to the week already. i was sure that after a break over the weekend i would be ready to tackle all the things i have to get done this week but i feel totally wrung out about it and overwhelmed by the task ahead of me. instead of being sensible about feeling this way, i usually just get the shits with myself about it and end up feeling worse. i am trying to think of other things i need to work on (finishing off some other tables, going back over my instrumentation charts after downloading a lot of other 'unsurpassed masters', changing a few time signatures around - 6/8 -12/8 etc) so that i can at least be on the way to finishing things up without actually having to go back to chord progressions again, at least for today... but even that seems like a pain at the moment and i'm having to drrrrrag myself in front of the computer to do it. it's not that i'm sick of the music, i just feel like i've run out of steam. discounting a couple of days here and there for being sick, i guess i haven't taken a break since christmas time. i think tim and i are both dying for a few days off, tim even more than me, i suspect...he's had it a lot harder than i have.

ohhhh wouldn't it be nice if i were smarter, then this wouldn't have to take so long...etc.

i was always going to have good and bad days, good and bad weeks, good and bad months, even... but i know that i mostly just have to quit whinging and get my shit together already. it's may and i when i look back at the work i've done this year it looks like i've done absolutely nothing. 5 months work and all i have to show for it is a bunch of charts and tables in a 2-ring binder? kashgdkjhgkasdhjfkuytaksuytdkuyatskydt. i need to stop being so hard on myself today. the end.
Link13 comments|Leave a comment

don't back down [May. 14th, 2008|02:33 pm]
[Tags|, , , , ]
[Current Mood | apprehensive]
[Current Music |"my girl" by roger joseph manning jnr]

after a few weeks of marking i am finally back to working on my own studies. at the time, the break from it was good, but by last week i was really missing being able to work on my own stuff. marking, though it is draining sometimes, is often a good thing too, as i've had to spend a lot of time reading other people's essay and figuring out what is wrong (or right!) with them. i feel like this is always good practice for writing up my own work. all this aside, now that the clouds have cleared and i can get back to work, i almost feel a bit stuck, so here i am, trying to get myself organised again.

what have i got left to do on my musical analysis (part 1)?
well, i have written up and printed out all of my charts up until PET SOUNDS...which is all i have left in relation to chord progressions. i've been dreading this from the beginning for a variety of reasons (mostly because it will just be really hard!) but i know i just have to get it done (and not be afraid/feel stupid to ask for help (probyn!) when i need it).

after i finish that, i need to go back and fix up a few little bits and pieces (tempo/time sigs and also instrumentation) before it's time to tie up this particular section. this is both good and bad news - good because i can move onto something new, but bad in some ways because i actually have to start WRITING after this.

what do i need to start writing?
to start with, i need to start writing up what i have found in my basic analysis - what did i do (i analysed some basic musical structures - tempo, time and key sigs, chord progressions, instrumentation, some lyrics/themes), how did i do it? (er, by sitting at the piano a lot!) and what has come out of it. the last part will obviously be the tricky part, listing all of the interesting things i have noticed in the music (hoping i can remember all of them) that might lead to other things, but also trying to figure out some research questions from this - all the "whys" and "hows". this should probably seem a bit exciting but i'm mostly feeling a bit apprehensive about it. i think i'm a bit nervous about actually "officially" putting pen to paper (or finger to keyboard!) in my phd. until this point, i have managed to avoid attempting this due to having this blog and also starting on my analysis first (okay, so it's technically a "literature review" but with records and not books)... but pretty soon i will have to get started and i'd be lying if i said i wasn't a bit anxious about it.

what a stupid thing to be anxious about WRITING doing a PHD! what was i thinking? i don't think i am anxious about writing in general (i know what i'm getting myself into) it's more just making the start. none of what i write now will probably end up in my paper anyway, and if it does, it will look and read completely differently, it's just the STARTING. i need to really keep my stupid self esteem in check (ha ha!) so i don't get into my stupid habit of deleting everything after i write it. (tim, please keep an eye on me with this, please? - see? asking for help!).

it is only after i finish this part that i can really meet back up with donna and make a plan of where to go next, which is basically setting up my methodology. hopefully that will be on the way before my confirmation of canditure in late august. everyone says i shouldn't flip out about it, but as if i'm not going to. i think after august i will start to feel a bit more together with things - i will hopefully have got a lot of the groundwork out of the way, hopefully be allowed to continue and then get on with planning the rest of my paper. i can hardly believe i'm almost a year and a half into this. when i think about the phone call i had with my mum when the letter arrived telling me i had been accepted (it was mailed to her address and she read it on the phone)...it really doesn't seem like that long at all, maybe 6 months? goddamn time flies.

i get a lot of good ideas by talking them out, so if any of you want to strike up a conversation about the beach boys and get me rolling, i'm likely to rant out a bunch of ideas i haven't even realised yet.
Link2 comments|Leave a comment

orange crate art [Mar. 19th, 2008|04:58 pm]
[Tags|, , , , , , , , , , , , ]
[Current Mood | tired]
[Current Music |"san fransisco" by van dyke parks and brian wilson]

it has come to my attention over the last week that i have a few "anonymous" readers here, HELLO. HELLO CARPO!

i have a few of these fragmented posts i have been meaning to write but have somehow lost the inclination to actually type. where do i start here? i guess i can start by saying i'm officially done with ALL SUMMER LONG (LP) - there was quite a hold up going through this record, not because it was overly difficult, but because i had a bit of a crisis of low motivation and just general restlessness and feeling overwhelmed. the usual "how did i think i could be capable of pulling this off? i am an idiot" - you know the drill. though, that was last week, and now i'm here trying to get myself together again. printing out pages of charts from All Summer Long and putting them into The Folder of Charts with my other ones was quite a good feeling this afternoon. on the whole, the record wasn't too tricky, i had some moments with 'all summer long' but my biggest problem by far was 'girls on the beach' - which i always knew was going to be a bitch of a song to work out, but sounds so simple on the outside. it also has an truly excellent chord change MID-VERSE. the tonality is all over the place and it did my head in trying to figure out what was going on.

[random sidenote:
TOP 5 MODULATIONS in BEACH BOYS TUNES [so far]:
5) Girls on the Beach (last verse, MID-VERSE! - ah, this shift just kills me!)
4) I Get Around (verse-chorus - this is such a sneaky little shift i don't think i even realised it until i had to work it out!)
3) Don't Worry Baby (verse-chorus - this works much like "I Get Around" but this small change into a new key for the chorus is so skilful, you hardly know it's there. it's painfully obvious that the reason the beach boys were often written-off musically in their early years was because no one was HEARING these incredibly clever musical changes going on in the songs. the deeper you go, the more complicated it gets)
2) Keep an Eye on Summer (all over the goddamn place - this song has FOUR modulations - starts in the original key, moves through two modulations in the bridge, back to the original key again, and then up again to a different key to finish. the average listener would have no idea that any of this was happening because it sounds like a simple song, but it's anything but. CLEVER!)
1) Dance, Dance, Dance (last verse, MID-VERSE! - oh man, does this ever flip me out, the modulation right before the last chorus in this song is so amazingly clever and so amazingly fitting at the same time, it just hits that sweet-spot! i could play it over and over again! in fact, i think i will now!) ]

i digress...

on monday night, tim and i went to see ray davies at the enmore theatre because he's one of Those Dudes we probably won't ever get the chance to see in real life again (though i was sure wrong with the Stones!). it was also another case of Jadey and Tim vs the Baby Boomers. this seems to happen to us a lot, and i do often get those "looks" from them that say "aren't you a little young to be here?" - well, NO! actually, i even get it when i wear my Beatles tshirts, they tell me "you're too young to listen to that music, i bet you don't even know their songs" ...to which i say "OH? TRY ME! you patronising jerk!". okay, i might not say the last bit, but i probably know more than they do, i know EVERY song in intimate detail, if only they knew i was on here typing about my PhD in POPULAR MUSIC.

listening to all those kinks songs, i had the ideas from an article andy bennett wrote about britpop and british music in the back of my head. almost all of those old kinks tunes he played (and even some new ones) were describing british life - the streets, the houses, the people, the stereotyped little things they do, the lingo they used... not only this, but it sort of romanticised the whole thing (with the exception of "dead end street" i suppose...). the small faces did a similar sort of thing (even down to the pronounced accent - think of "lazy sunday afternoon") and the fabs sure dipped their toes in the water there ("penny lane", etc) too. while the idea of describing scenes where they live was not remarkable in itself, the romanticising of it was - andy bennett called this a "harking back to a Golden Age of British Life" (paraphrasing) and used it in describing britpop bands in the 1990's that were drawing from the ideas of the kinks and the small faces (blur's "parklife" or "charmless man" or pulp's "common people" - yes?)... i suspect the 1960's bands were doing it themselves too. there was still a very defined class system going on during that period, and for the working class, life wasn't always "tea and toasted buttered currant buns"...*

all of this was no revelation to me, but it was something i was flipping about in my mind while listening, because it reminded me a lot of what the beach boys were trying to do on the other side of the world, too. the beach boys were describing a type of fantasy world, a "golden age" of california, the stereotype, as bruce johnson put it, the "hollywodised version" of how things were. most of the beach boys (with the exception of maybe dennis) were not even involved with that kind of life - the beach and the surf and the girls and all the macho junk that goes along with it (mike love already had that last bit going on already!) - it was a dream, a "cartoon" portrait of how life was as a young person in california. while the beach boys weren't exactly "harking back" to some golden age (it was current at the time, the generation before the wilson's parents were the first to really head west and set up a new life in the sun)...but the idea was the same, it was trying to capture a snapshot of idealised californian life at the time.

this continued in so many ways throughout the beach boys songs, most obvious with SMiLE, i suppose, which while described as the soundtrack to a "bicycle ride from one coast to the other" - discusses so many things in abstract, fractured words. to me it is about stages of a life, of society but yes, also of the land and of those stereotypical american ideals. heroes and villains is probably the greatest example of this - but also through to the 1990's record brian wilson and van dyke parks released called 'orange crate art'. some of these songs seem to connect into thematic ideas from SMiLE (no surprise, all the songs on orange crate art were written by parks, and SMiLE was the height of their collaboration) - i know these themes of america, of land, of places and ideals have always been of interest to parks, and obviously to brian too.

"orange crate art" the song is tribute to the artwork that adorned the boxes that carried oranges from california. citrus fruits grew very well in california and was the reason many started a new life there in its early days. on these crates were pictures of the sunshine, the beach, the green trees, and tried to encourage people to make the big move west where the skies were bluer, the grass greener, and the oranges...well...more orange. "san fransisco" from that same record is almost a "heroes and villains part two" - and both songs seem to encompass that desire to be at one with the land, to explore, to jump on a train, hitch-hike, anyway you can, but just get out there. reminds me a lot of jack kerouac, actually. the thought never occurred to me to compare kerouac of the beats to the beach boys but somehow, today, it's making a lot of sense. kerouac is one of my favourites, maybe it's all coming together! beyond that, brian's new work "that lucky old sun" will come out sometime this year i suspect, and it is pretty much the same deal. sketches of californian life - the show i saw at the state theatre in january pulled all of this into place even clearer with all of the imagery on the screens behind the band and the spoken word "poems" (hello, maybe it is like the beats!) between songs...

what ties all of this together was when ray davies introduced "dedicated follower of fashion" on monday night, explaining that it was the song that really broke the kinks in america, and how it was always perplexing to him as it was such a "british" song and couldn't understand how the americans would "get it" let alone like it. Lines like "they seek him here, they seek him there, in regent street and leicester square, everywhere the carnabetian army marches on..." assumes a knowledge that the listener knows what "carnabetian" is referring to - what's the deal with the americans digging it?

the same thing happened throughout the entire beach boys career - they were always tremendously recieved in the UK, even through the 1970's - when the americans got tired, bored and ashamed of them, simply pegging them as those "little boys who wore the stripey shirts and sung about very UNHIP things like the beach and cars" - the UK audiences totally "got it" - perhaps because all of that sunshine was "exotic" in the same way carnaby street must have seemed "exotic" to the americans. this was especially notable with the release of "pet sounds" which absolutely bombed in the US (capitol was ashamed of it and rushed out a best of comp to make the consumers forget all about it) but was a hit in the UK. they "got it" - they understood that it has grown up from the candy stripes, it was artistic, psychedelic music. in fact, the beach boys out-voted the beatles in some of those "top musicians of the year" polls - out did the beatles in the UK?!

it's a phenomenon that has always perplexed me a little, and I know this is linked up with music and geography and will have to find a way to express this properly. i do happen to have one specific article about it, but will need to look harder. i know i haven't exactly explained it well, but i hope when i read this in a years time when i come to write about some of these things properly i will understand what i meant.

i managed to rant this little thought to tim throughout intermission (wonder if those baby boomers were listening?) and since he knows i forget these things as soon as i say them, kindly texted me a string of random words from what i had explained to him so i wouldn't forget, so hopefully i managed to expand "beach boys, locality, kinks, america, dedicated follower of fashion, exotic" into something that makes sense?

i must admit sometimes i have to fight the urge to jump on a plane to LA and just sit on one of those "surfin' USA" beaches under a palm tree and ponder all of this.




----------------------------
* - i understand that it should be noted there is a certain amount of irony, a certain "cartoonishness" in the portraits these bands were singing about, i do take this into consideration...but that's a whole other can o' worms.
Link13 comments|Leave a comment

a day in the life [Mar. 12th, 2008|10:11 am]
[Current Mood | flat]

here is what my days look like, sometimes: )
Link4 comments|Leave a comment

cork on the ocean [Feb. 27th, 2008|03:30 pm]
[Current Mood | lost]

i have been meaning to make a post but i kind of said everything in emails to tim this afternoon:

jadey wrote:
argh all summer long! stupid all summer long!!

tim wrote:
you seem to be finding that song hard..

tim.

jadey wrote:
no no, i've got it now, it's just that the harmonies cloud everything, it's hard to hear, some of the little changes are hard to pick up on... it's like, shit, is that a 6th? i know it's not a straight chord? but it's just so subtle. i have it now, though, i feel accomplished. i am so worried about not getting these chords right, though. i know there will be mistakes in what i have figured out, but there's no way to tell..i just feel overwhelmed by this task and i haven't even got up to the hard stuff yet :(

tim wrote:
you'll get there. it's just difficult and you have to back your opinion on these things if it's ambiguous. try the all summer long sessions, i reckon that tune is there. or maybe on the stack-of-tracks disc?

jadey wrote:
i don't just mean about all summer long, i am pretty sure i have that right now... i just mean in general. i'm so overwhelmed - how did i think i could work out hundreds and hundreds of these songs? i know i am really on the edge of a little meltdown with this stuff, seem to have lost my confidence with it. feel stupid though, because you've got it so much harder than i do at the moment and you don't complain. i feel like i have been imagining things i could be doing if i wasn't doing this...which doesn't make sense because if i quit and did something else, i'd be totally lost.

tim wrote:
it's hard because you're coming up against weaknesses in your personality. that's what makes phds hard - they really force you to come to terms with any things in yourself that you're uncomfortable with. in this case, your insecurity about yourself as a musician is making it hard because it's confronting to try and get things right when you're not entirely sure you're good enough. i mean, ask darian about ones that you find frustrating or something, or bits that you're unsure of, if it really worries you?

i can tell you that your aural skills are really good, you're very good as a musician and you don't need to worry, but you need to know that in your heart in order to make this easier.

jadey wrote:
i know, i have no idea how to do that, i am pretty resigned to knowing i will always struggle with it, it's just the girl that i am. it's stupid because i'm the only one who puts pressure on myself about it, i am just continually frustrated i'm not better than i am. i knew i was always going to have to fight this throughout my phd - even applying was hard enough. i'm sure you recall me wanting to throw the towel in the night before?

it's not even that i am getting to point where i think "i have no idea what these chords are" - i can work out SOMETHING that sounds like it fits, but i can't ever be certain that it is what's playing. i understand i can only use what i can work out, but it's hard because this is such a BIG part of my analysis and if i don't get the chords perfectly right, it will kind of blow up in my face eventually. i don't know about my ability to get them just right - you know how it is, you can fob your way through stuff, even if you're not sure it's exact when you play covers or gigs or whatever, but this just seems so freaking important. i almost beat myself before i start!

darian is actually online now, i added him to skype a couple of days ago. it says he's 'away' though, so i won't bug him. though i do like just seeing his contact there. oh, there he goes offline.


tim wrote:
what i'd do is not worry too much about the curly bits. make a note of where they are and send him an email with them all asking for his opinion.

and yeah, i'm aware that you have this struggle - it was so surreal that night before when you wanted to throw the towel in, because you're so talented. was almost funny in a sad way, you know?

and yeah, it's better to be closer to a perfectionist than closer to a lazy slob with this kind of stuff, but there's only so much you can do, you know? perhaps even make a note saying that it's difficult to
determine, things like that?

jadey wrote:
yeah, you're right, i should. but they're just such tiny things, you know? is it a 7th? isn't it? you'd think it would be easy to tell but sometimes it's not when you have all these layers going on and one instrument might play the 7th while others don't...it just gets all cloudy in there.

it didn't seem remotely funny or surreal to ME at the time, tim! though it is amazing what perspective half a block of chocolate can give....

i am sure i will have to make a note of things saying "THIS IS HARD, i am going with the closest progression i can work out" - but obviously in a more suitable way.


....................................
basically i am going through a bit of a struggle at the moment. now i need to stop rearranging the face on this mister potato head and get back to doing some work.
Link7 comments|Leave a comment

keep an eye on summer [Jan. 29th, 2008|04:25 pm]
[Current Mood | stressed]

for the last couple of weeks, i have been focussing on chords and progressions for my musical analysis. here is a list of songs i have done (worked out and charted properly):

1) surfin' safari
2) county fair
3) ten little indians
4) chug-a-lug
5) little girl (you're my miss america)
6) 409
7) surfin'
8) heads you win, tails i lose
9) summertime blues
10) cuckoo clock
11) moon dawg
12) the shift
13) surfin' USA
14) farmer's daughter
15) misirlou
16) stoked
17) lonely sea
18) shut down
19) noble surfer
20) honky tonk
21) lana
22) surf jam
23) let's go trippin'
24) finders keepers
25) surfer girl
26) catch a wave
27) the surfer moon
28) south bay surfer
29) rocking surfer
30) little deuce coupe
31) in my room
32) hawaii
33) surfers rule
34) our car club
35) your summer dream
36) boogie woodie
37) ballad of ole' betsy
38) be true to your school
39) car crazy cutie
40) cherry cherry coupe
41) spirit of america
42) no-go showboat
43) a young man is gone (this is a work in progress)
44) custom machine
45) fun fun fun
46) don't worry baby
47) in the parkin' lot
48) the warmth of the sun
49) this car of mine
50) why do fools fall in love?
51) pom pom play girl
52) keep an eye on summer
53) shut down part II
54) louie louie

oh man! and i'm not even halfway there...
LinkLeave a comment

brian wilson at the domain [Jan. 7th, 2008|02:04 pm]
[Tags|, , , , , , , , ]
[Current Mood | excited]


tim and i wait for the music to start. i am pretty excited. also, here is everyone braving the rain.

the dark clouds rolled in but managed to hold off for almost all of brian's set.

here is my sweet new pet sounds tshirt. i also may have been jumping around and squealing a little bit in my attractive rain poncho.

i had a beautiful time on saturday night. although the weather was terrible, tim, casey, jo and i braved the rain and set ourselves up in front of the stage. it was a lovely evening despite the weather. i was so overjoyed i could barely contain myself. they played lots of my favourites (including "please let me wonder"...!) and i danced and sang with my friends and my boy-type and without getting painfully sappy, it was a great night. i'll write more about these things later when i have a little more time.

last night i spent a few hours at a party with carpo and some of brian wilson's band (one of which was a wondermint!) - it was totally amazing to talk to them. i didn't get to ask them much about my studies, as it just wasn't the right time for it, but i at least introduced myself and they know who i am now. they told me some interesting little stories about their experiences, talked about some records and may have handed out at couple of jane vs world EPs. i spent the whole night reminding myself to just BE COOL. as carpo and i walked to our cars, i thanked him profusely and said 'was i cool? did i seem cool?' and he said 'yes! you were amazingly cool, no fangirl at all!' and i said 'great, well i'll see you tomorrow, i'm going to go and squeal in my car now'.

and i did.

we're all going to the show tonight with the vague potential of meeting up afterwards (backstage??). argh, i can't hack this, too much excitement for one week.
Link8 comments|Leave a comment

a half a dozen reindeer with rudy to lead [Jan. 2nd, 2008|12:06 pm]
well here i am in 2008, feeling a little dazed and confused as to where 2007 went. everyone i know is "back to work" today, so here i am, back at work too - on the couch with a cup of tea, ready to start off this year PRODUCTIVELY. i hope that my little "break" over christmas means that i will be ready to kick some musicological ass now. (i hope! i hope! i hope!)

i was spoilt rotten for christmas and was given these beach boys-related stephen mcparland books from my dad:



"the california sound" (the musical biography of gary usher)
this is a massive hardcover thing that barely fits into my bookshelf. i get the feeling i will only need a few chapters of this book, and although you are able to just buy the "brian wilson related chapters", my dad never does things by halves and insisted that i have the entire tome. it is pretty interesting none the less and i was very happy to open up the wrapping paper to find this! this also came with a DVD that i haven't watched yet.



"the wilson project"
this is a seires of tapes that gary usher made when trying to reunite with brian to write some songs in the early 80's that have been transcribed. this reunion was pretty much stamped on by eugene landy at the time, so i am interested to flick through and see what is inside. i saw one volume of this in the sydney uni library, stuck up the back of a very high shelf, but only being one volume, it didn't offer any information as to what the whole thing was about. now i do!



"bull sessions with big daddy- interviews with those who shaped the california sound"
this is a collection of quotes and things from various people who were around in california in the early to mid 1960's. most interesting to me is the use of the term "california sound" in the title, actually. i'm interested to see how it is explained or defined (or if that is even touched on!) in the quotes.

i am seriously running out of room on my bookshelf and a trip to ikea is clearly in order.

the point of this post was to try and get myself together for the next couple of months and work out exactly what i need to be doing. i will be at school again at the end of january for a good couple of weeks so i want to have a bunch of things done by then.

a list of things to get done:
1) questions for wondermints (this is urgent and everything else gets put aside)
2) rest of chord charts/keys for 60's records
3) finish tempos (yes jadey, for goddamn sake, GET IT DONE)
4) fish around some journals for specific definitions, it has been a little while now.

okay. that is a start for january. the first item on that list is quite a large deal that i haven't discussed in here yet and will do so after this post (!!!) here's to lots of good and interesting times, learning, reading, writing and positive things in my second year as a phd student.
Link2 comments|Leave a comment

warmed up weather, let's get together and do it again [Dec. 11th, 2007|04:34 pm]
[Tags|, , , ]
[Current Mood | hopeful]



hi! good afternoon! brian and i are back on pet studies!


do i look suitably fangirl? (yes, i really do have a brian wilson action figure, even if he does look a bit more like carl?)

it has been so long, but i won't go into it because i'm tired of talking about how unwell i have been, but due to all of that, i have fallen a bit behind in my work. to slowly get myself back into the rhythm of things, lately i have taken to re-watching all my beach boys documentaries and have been jotting down all sorts of quotes that seem useful into an expanding "index" that i can refer to when i need it. i'm not exactly sure what quotes i will need and use, but there are some that seem important and others that seem to back up some of the things that i am finding in my data collection (or as donna would say, my "acting like an academic bower bird" - much nicer)

this morning, i was hanging out on the couch, watching "endless harmony", drinking tea and snacking on crackers and delicious hommus in front of my lappy and it was just blissful! what a way to go to work! sure i have no money, but i feel fulfilled. i am feeling a bit more inspired with my work each day and i think watching through some of these docos has really been a good way to get the fire burning again. last night the wind was howling outside and i lay on my bed, stared at the ceiling and listened to the vocal only stack-o-tracks version of "wouldn't it be nice" over and over again (maybe 30+ times?) just thinking and dreaming and listening and breaking it apart and putting it back together and it was beautiful.

due to all of these happenings in my head, lately i feel an overwhelming need to talk some things out with someone, anyone who is prepared to listen. i'm sure i drive tim nuts with it sometimes and i think i purposely bottle it up now. i don't really want to talk about extremely technical things, but just to talk about the music and the lyrics and the paradoxes because once i get ranting, all sorts of things come out and all sorts of things slot into place - stuff that has obviously been bubbling away in the back of my head that i haven't even realised. sometimes i wonder if i should set myself up in the pitt st mall with all the buskers and homeless people... just sit right down in the street with a sign that says "lonely academic needs chats about pop music"...
Link11 comments|Leave a comment

columnated ruins domino [Nov. 1st, 2007|09:00 pm]
[Current Mood | tired]
[Current Music |"pretty ballerina" by the left banke]

i am sitting at my desk in the postgrad room romanticising the idea of being at uni again. you know, with the walks from parklands and the humidity and having lunches with luke at the cafe and talking about how no one understands (haha). just like old times.

my aim this week is to be as productive as i can, as i have a lot of work to catch up on. my problem at the moment is that the more work i do, the more work i realise i need to be doing.

over the last few weeks i have stopped reading theory papers and have started my musical analysis. well, collecting musical data FOR an analysis at least. this involves a lot of listening and working out tempos, time signatures, instrumentation, chords and so on... (i have left melody and rhythm until last, as these will be the hardest). i am enjoying this quite a bit because i get to listen to the beach boys a lot, but working out just a handful of these things for various albums has made me realise that:

a) the more i do, the less it seems i have accomplished
b) i am missing a lot of specifics in sections such as the types or harmonies (bup bups, doo doos), lyrics and production styles (i am finding this is opening up into something that is different from just "instrumentation"), and also the types of instruments making the sounds (what organs, what guitars, etc)
c) i really need to do this for more than the 10 or so albums i was intending to look at. i really need to be doing this for the 1970's albums as well if only so i can see how the music relates. i flippantly think that the music they made later in their career was not really any major advancement from the music they made in the 1960s... but i guess i need to actually pull the music apart to prove this.
d) in order to compare the beach boys' music to their influences, i'm going to have to pull apart the four freshmen (oh shit) and possibly frankie valli and the four seasons as well.

next to my desk at home i have a little chart where i cross off the data i have collected from various albums (eg: Surfer Girl LP - tempo (check) time signature (check) chords and lyrics (check) etc). i feel like every time i cross something off, i find something else that needs to be looked at.. so while i add more X's, the chart gets bigger and i end up getting nowhere. i am often overwhelmed by all that there is to know. (though didn't socrates say "wisest is (s)he who knows (s)he does not know"...?)

so what do i do when i feel overwhelmed? you'd think it would be 'make a logical plan' or something helpful, but it's more often than not that i think of some excuse to go to officeworks for a while. surely i can't continue this musical analysis if i don't have a selection of highlighter colours to choose from or a stack of new post-its or some other ring-binder with rainbow dividers in it? right? yup.

that said, i guess i'd rather have too much to do, than no idea what i should be doing.

this probably won't make sense to any of you, but this is just a random list of tiny fragments of ideas that aren't fully formed, but that i have thought about when i have been collecting data* over the last few days. i know some of you (bizza) will reply to this probably pulling apart stuff i've said here but, like i said, these are only very vague ideas that i haven't really got a hold on. this is just to remind myself at a later date.

-> on the early records, the beach boys seemed to have worked out their own "ballad style" where the slower songs are, in most cases, in 6/8, use a specific rhythm on the guitar and are often the ones most overwhelmed with vocal harmonies. often these songs are connected lyrically and speak of regret (kiss me baby, she knows me too well, don't worry baby), loss (warmth of the sun, lonely sea, keep an eye on summer), longing (surfer girl, please let me wonder, and your dream comes true), introspection (in my room) and teenage frustration (i'm so young, we'll run away)... rarely are these straight love songs. obviously there are exceptions to this rule (your summer dream [a pretty dirty song underneath the sweet production], girls on the beach [standard hot-surfer-girl song], ballad of ole' betsy [quite a nice love song if it wasn't about a car, which you only find out at the end!]). most of these songs are expressing emotions that are quite complicated, especially if you consider the use of the "sun" and "summer" to be metaphorical. this is rant that i will do at another time.

-> writing ballads didn't appear until Surfin' U.S.A with "lonely sea" which has chords and a structure that is not stereotypical of their style. there is something funny about this song.

-> pretty much all of the songs on Pet Sounds are in 4/4. for some reason i found this surprising, as it is the most rhythmically complex record the beach boys produced. this obviously means that the complicated rhythms are happening in the music itself (drums, percussion) rather than in a complicated time signature. ("caroline, no" does seem to have something funky going on in the intro, though... ) - is this a way that brian had one foot in psychedellia and one foot in standard, accessible pop music?

-> almost all of the songs on the early 5-6 albums used a standard instrumentation (electric guitar, drums, bass, vocals) - gradually, organ was added and by "all summer long" LP and "shut down" LP the organ or piano almost became part of the "standard instrumentation". at first, the organ was used as the first part of the solo break (followed with 4-8 bars of carl ripping off chuck berry, etc) but as the albums progress, the organ and piano began to be used in more inventive ways.

->speaking of inventive ways, what i am finding important is not the lineup of instruments, but the way in which these instruments are used - "surfer girl" and "little deuce coupe" both have the exact same instrumental line up, but they don't sound much alike at all. does this have to do with timbre? i think i need to perhaps look at the sounds of the sounds, rather than listing the instruments being used. perhaps this will open up a bit once i get to "pet sounds" but the more i look into instrumentation, the more i feel like i'm not getting the information i need to be getting. perhaps i am getting too ahead of myself trying to analyse before i collect the data i need to look over the music?

-> i expected more instruments to be used in some of these early records, but the most "far out" sounds were a toy piano on "noble surfer", a xylophone on "all summer long" and, i guess, a harpsichord on "when i grow up (to be a man)". for some reason i was surprised by this, but after doing a lot of listening, it occurs to me that maybe there just isn't ROOM for it. the harmonies, especially from "little deuce coupe" onwards, almost acted like the chordal instrument in a lot of songs.

-> something that i also noticed was the lack of percussion used in the songs i have looked at. for some reason, in my head, i assumed there was actually quite a lot of tambourine, handclaps, etc in early beach boys songs, but only a handful of songs employ either of these things. i am interested to get to "today!" and "summer days (and summer nights!!)" to see if these percussive elements i have assumed in my head actually pop up in the lead up to "pet sounds" ...

i guess what i mean by some of these points is that some of the things i have thoughtlessly assumed over years of listening (and not analysing) have turned out to not be entirely true after i have started to pull things apart. i'm not sure why this is... perhaps i have my own preconception of what my version of "the beach boys sound" is (who am i kidding, of course i do)... it is interesting to see parts of this preconception totally fall apart already...kind of makes me more interested to see what i will find.

at school i was never much good at science, but this investigating feels like a bit of scientific adventure.




*i do hate to use the term "collecting data" as it seems to suck all the life out of listening to the music. i wonder if there is another way i can put it?
Link6 comments|Leave a comment

cork on the ocean [Oct. 17th, 2007|12:15 pm]
[Current Mood | restless]
[Current Music |"wonderful" by the beach boys]



yup.
Link5 comments|Leave a comment

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]
[ go | earlier ]

Advertisement